10.2003.398•Strike-off after withdrawal of objection to criminal decree
10.2003.398Übriges Gericht06.11.2003Dismissed
Von Omnilex extrahiert
The accused had filed an objection to a decree of accusation, but his lawyer later withdrew it in writing. The Pretura penale noted the withdrawal, struck the case from the docket, and held that the decree of accusation became enforceable. The hearing scheduled for 7 November 2003 was cancelled and the file was returned to the public prosecutor for any further steps within his competence. Costs of CHF 80 in total were imposed on the objector.
Art. 210 cpv. 3 CPP; withdrawal of opposition to a decree of accusation: upon formal withdrawal of the objection, the opposition proceedings are terminated and struck from the docket; the decree of accusation acquires enforceability. Any already scheduled public hearing is rendered moot. Costs of the strike-off proceedings may be charged to the objecting party.
AIUTO RICERCA
Anteprima di stampa
Numero d'incarto: 10.2003.398
Data decisione, Autorità: 06.11.2003, PRPEN
Incarto n. 10.2003.398 DA 1660/2003
Bellinzona, 6 novembre 2003
Decreto di stralcio In nome della Repubblica e Cantone del Ticino
Il Giudice della Pretura penale
Giorgio Bassetti
Richiamata l'opposizione 28 maggio 2003 di
__________ __________, .1973, di __________ e __________ n. , nato a __________ /, attinente di __________ /, domiciliato a __________, via __________, celibe, impiegato, difeso da: Avv. __________ __________, __________,
interposta al decreto d’accusa n. DA / di data __________ 2003 del Procuratore pubblico Mario Branda, __________,
preso atto del ritiro della suddetta opposizione con scritto 5 novembre 2003 del patrocinatore dell’accusato, avv. Stefano Pizzola, __________;
visto l’art. 210 cpv. 3 CPP,
decreta: 1. Il procedimento è stralciato dai ruoli e il decreto d'accusa diventa esecutivo.
Il pubblico dibattimento, già fissato per il 7 novembre 2003, alle ore 14.30, non avrà quindi luogo; l'incarto è ritornato al Procuratore pubblico Mario Branda, __________, per quanto di sua competenza.
La tassa di giustizia di fr. 50.00 e le spese relative alla presente decisione, in ragione di fr. 30.00, sono a carico dell'opponente.
Intimazione a:
__________, via __________ __________, __________, Procuratore pubblico Mario Branda, viale __________, __________, Avv. __________, via __________, __________.
Il giudice: Il segretario:
Distinta spese: Tassa di giustizia fr. 50.00
Spese giudiziarie fr. 30.00
Totale fr. 80.00
Ultimo aggiornamento: 02.07.2026
| Informazioni legali | Requisiti minimi | Contatta il webmaster
Von Omnilex extrahiert
Whether the objection to the decree of accusation should be struck off after withdrawal.
Yes. The proceeding was removed from the roll and the decree of accusation became enforceable.
The court took note of the formal withdrawal of the objection by defence counsel and applied Art. 210(3) CPP.
What happens to the scheduled public hearing after the withdrawal of the objection?
The hearing fixed for 7 November 2003 would not take place and the file was returned to the public prosecutor for further action within his competence.
Once the objection was withdrawn, there was no longer any need for the hearing set in the opposition proceedings.
Who bears the costs of this decision?
The objecting party must pay the court fee of CHF 50 and judicial costs of CHF 30.
Costs were allocated against the objector following the strike-off of the opposition proceedings.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.