projekte

Household unity for social housing surcharge despite weekday lodging

ATA/700/1996Cour de justice / Verwaltungskammer26.11.1996Other

Originalquelle öffnen

Zusammenfassung

The decision concerns social-housing surcharge eligibility under the LGL. The court held that an employed housemaid holding a B permit and working 70% remained in a common household with her husband, even though she slept during the week at her employer’s home. Temporary lodging required by employment did not sever the marital household within the meaning of Art. 31(c)(a) LGL.

Regest

Art. 31 let. c LGL; common household and social-housing surcharge: the existence of a ménage commun with the spouse is not excluded by the fact that the tenant, employed as a housemaid and working 70%, sleeps during the week at the employer’s home. What is decisive is whether the marital household subsists in substance; employment-related weekday lodging is only temporary and does not of itself establish a separate household.

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Descripteurs

LOGEMENT; MODIFICATION(EN GENERAL); SURTAXE; LOGEMENT SOCIAL; MENAGE COMMUN; IEA

Normes

LGL.30; LGL.31 c

Résumé

Fait ménage commun avec son époux, au sens de l'article 31 C lettre a LGL, l'employée de maison, titulaire d'un permis B, qui travaille à 70 % et dort en semaine au domicile de son employeur. Fait ménage commun avec son époux, au sens de l'article 31 C lettre a LGL, l'employée de maison, titulaire d'un permis B, qui travaille à 70 % et dort en semaine au domicile de son employeur.

Schlagwörter

social housingsurchargecommon householdmarital householdweekday lodgingtenancy modification