Breast or facial corrective surgery not aesthetic if medically necessary

ATA/390/1997Cour de justice / Verwaltungskammer24.06.1997Granted

Von Omnilex extrahiert

Omnilex-Zusammenfassung

The case concerned whether interventions intended to correct difficult mobilization of the chin muscles were excluded as cosmetic surgery under the old health insurance statute. The court held that the procedures were not aesthetic operations because their purpose was not merely to change the claimant's appearance, but to alleviate a persistent physical disorder. Coverage therefore had to be granted under Art. 12 al. 2 ch. 2 LAMA.

Omnilex-Regeste

Art. 12 al. 2 ch. 2 LAMA; distinction between aesthetic surgery and medically indicated treatment. Interventions are not excluded as cosmetic operations when, according to their objective and therapeutic function, they are intended to remedy a lasting physical impairment and not merely to modify the patient's physiognomy. The qualifying criterion is the medical purpose of the procedure; an appearance-related benefit alone is insufficient, whereas treatment of a persistent functional disorder brings the intervention within insured medical care.

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Descripteurs

ASSURANCE SOCIALE; AM; ASSURANCE COMPLEMENTAIRE; COUVERTURE; SOINS MEDICAUX; FRAIS(EN GENERAL); LIMITATION; THERAPIE; OPERATION; TRAITEMENT(EN GENERAL); PRESTATION D'ASSURANCE(EN GENERAL); OPERATION DE CHIRURGIE COSMETIQUE; ASSU

Normes

LAMA.12 al.2 ch.2

Résumé

Des interventions médicales destinées à corriger une mobilisation difficile des muscles du menton ne peuvent être qualifiées d'opérations esthétiques, leur but n'étant pas simplement de modifier la physionomie de la recourante, mais de la soulager d'un trouble physique persistant.

Schlagwörter

social insurancehealth insurancemedical treatmentcoveragecosmetic surgerytherapeutic necessitymedical expensesfunctional impairment

Von Omnilex extrahiert

Kernrechtsfrage

Whether the disputed interventions are cosmetic surgery excluded from coverage or medically necessary treatment covered by social insurance.

Extrahierter Entscheid

The interventions are not aesthetic operations; their purpose is not merely to alter appearance but to relieve a persistent physical disorder.

Extrahierte Begründung

The decisive criterion is the therapeutic aim and functional necessity of the intervention. Where the procedure addresses an ongoing physical impairment, it cannot be classified as a purely cosmetic operation.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.