Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the appeal met the federal statutory reasoning requirements.
Extrahierter Entscheid
No; the conclusions and reasoning were incomprehensible and did not show any violation of law.
Extrahierte Begründung
The appeal did not comply with Art. 42(1)-(2) LTF because it failed to state, even briefly, why the challenged judgment would be unlawful; therefore simplified non-entry was appropriate under Art. 108(1)(b) LTF.