Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the appeal was admissible despite the missing challenged decision and insufficient reasoning.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The appeal could not be considered because the appellant did not submit the challenged decision after being invited to do so, and the filing also failed to explain how the lower court judgment violated the law.
Extrahierte Begründung
Under Arts. 42(3) and 42(5) LTF, the challenged decision must be attached and missing attachments must be remedied within a set deadline; failure leads to non-consideration. The filing also did not meet the minimal reasoning requirements of Art. 42(2) LTF.