Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the complaint against the interlocutory suspension order was admissible before the Federal Supreme Court.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The complaint was inadmissible because the appellant did not show any admissibility ground for challenging a separately notified interlocutory order.
Extrahierte Begründung
Such orders are reviewable only under Arts. 92 or 93 BGG. The appellant bears the burden to demonstrate a non-reparable harm or another exceptional ground, but the submission contained no such showing and none was apparent.