Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the subsidiary constitutional appeal was admissible despite lacking comprehensible reasoning against the cantonal decision.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The appeal was inadmissible because it contained no comprehensible reasoning and did not meet the statutory pleading requirements.
Extrahierte Begründung
The filing did not address the cantonal court's reasons and failed to satisfy the motivation requirements under the Federal Supreme Court Act; the appellant acted abusively as well.