Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible despite lacking comprehensible reasoning against the cantonal judgment.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The complaint was inadmissible because it did not contain understandable reasoning directed at the cantonal grounds and did not meet the statutory reasoning requirements.
Extrahierte Begründung
The filing failed to challenge the cantonal reasoning and thus did not satisfy Art. 117 and Art. 106 para. 2 LTF; the filing was also abusive under Art. 42 para. 7 LTF.