Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the subsidiary constitutional complaint was admissible against the cantonal decision granting definitive debt enforcement.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The complaint was not admissible because it did not meet the requirements for a subsidiary constitutional complaint and was partly directed at relief that could not be sought in this proceeding.
Extrahierte Begründung
The challenged decision was a pecuniary matter below the statutory value threshold, so only the subsidiary constitutional complaint was available. However, the filing did not address the decisive reasoning of the cantonal court and failed to set out, in a specific and reasoned manner, which constitutional rights were violated. The damages request was outside the scope of the proceedings. The filing was also abusive.