Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the subsidiary constitutional complaint complied with the motivation requirements and was admissible.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The complaint did not challenge the cantonal reasoning in an intelligible way and was therefore inadmissible.
Extrahierte Begründung
The submission failed to satisfy the strict motivation requirements of Arts. 116, 117 and 106(2) LTF; the arguments were manifestly insufficient.