Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the federal appeal met the statutory reasoning requirements.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The appeal did not contain any admissible legal argument attacking the cantonal decision and was therefore manifestly insufficiently reasoned.
Extrahierte Begründung
The appellant merely stated that he was dissatisfied and alleged untrue statements, without engaging with the challenged reasoning, contrary to Art. 42(2) and 106(2) LTF.