Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the constitutional complaint was admissible despite non-payment of the court-ordered advance of costs.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The complaint was inadmissible because the required advance of costs was not paid within the prescribed time limits.
Extrahierte Begründung
The court noted that the advance payment ordered on 5 June 2008 and extended on 26 June 2008 under Art. 62(3) LTF was not made in time; under Art. 62(3) LTF, the appeal is inadmissible for that reason.