Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the subsidiary constitutional appeal met the statutory motivation requirements and could be heard
Extrahierter Entscheid
The appeal was not admissible because it contained no sufficiently reasoned constitutional grievance.
Extrahierte Begründung
A subsidiary constitutional appeal may invoke only violations of fundamental rights, which must be specifically pleaded. The appellant raised no such grievance and instead challenged mainly the peace judge’s non-final decision, which cannot be attacked in this appeal.