2P.100/2004•Refusal of lawyer register entry upheld
2P.100/2004Bundesgericht / II. öffentlich-rechtliche Abteilung27.07.2004Dismissed
Von Omnilex extrahiert
The applicant challenged the Zürich authorities' refusal to grant him a lawyer's patent and enter him in the cantonal lawyer register. The Federal Court held that the filing had to be treated as an administrative law appeal, but the appellant failed to show that he possessed the required patent and his remaining objections were merely impermissible criticism of federal law. The appeal was dismissed in summary procedure. The request for free legal aid was refused because the case was hopeless, and court costs of CHF 500 were imposed on the appellant.
Art. 97 ff. OG, Art. 191 BV, Art. 36a OG; administrative law appeal against cantonal decisions on lawyer-register entry. Where a final cantonal decision concerns the application of the Federal Lawyers Act, the Federal Court treats an incorrectly designated constitutional complaint as an administrative law appeal. Pure criticism of the validity or desirability of a federal statute is inadmissible, since federal acts bind the Federal Court and all authorities under Art. 191 BV. If the appellant neither substantiates the legal prerequisites for entry nor raises arguable federal-law objections, the appeal is manifestly unfounded and may be decided summarily. Unentgeltliche Rechtspflege is refused where the legal remedy lacks prospects of success; costs are borne by the losing party.
{T 0/2}
2P.100/2004 /leb
Urteil vom 27. Juli 2004
II. Öffentlichrechtliche Abteilung
Besetzung
Bundesrichter Wurzburger, Präsident,
Bundesrichter Betschart, Hungerbühler,
Gerichtsschreiber Häberli.
Parteien
A.________,
Beschwerdeführer,
gegen
Aufsichtskommission über die Rechtsanwälte im Kanton Zürich, c/o Obergericht, Hirschengraben 15, 8023 Zürich,
Obergericht des Kantons Zürich, Verwaltungskommission, Hirschengraben 15,
8023 Zürich.
Gegenstand
Eintragung in das kantonale Anwaltsregister,
Staatsrechtliche Beschwerde gegen den
Beschluss des Obergerichts des Kantons Zürich, Verwaltungskommission, vom 9. Juli 2004.
Nach Einsicht
zieht das Bundesgericht in Erwägung,
Demgemäss wird im Verfahren nach Art. 36a OG erkannt:
1.
Die Beschwerde vom 20. Juli 2004 wird als Verwaltungsgerichtsbeschwerde behandelt und abgewiesen.
2.
Das Gesuch um Gewährung der unentgeltlichen Rechtspflege wird abgewiesen.
3.
Die Gerichtsgebühr von Fr. 500.-- wird dem Beschwerdeführer auferlegt.
4.
Dieses Urteil wird dem Beschwerdeführer, der Aufsichtskommission über die Rechtsanwälte im Kanton Zürich und dem Obergericht des Kantons Zürich, Verwaltungskommission, sowie dem Eidgenössischen Justiz- und Polizeidepartement schriftlich mitgeteilt.
Lausanne, 27. Juli 2004
Im Namen der II. öffentlichrechtlichen Abteilung
des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts
Der Präsident: Der Gerichtsschreiber:
Von Omnilex extrahiert
Whether the filing had to be treated as an administrative law appeal rather than a constitutional complaint.
The filing was treated as an administrative law appeal under the applicable federal procedural rules.
Against final cantonal decisions on the application of the Federal Lawyers Act, administrative law appeal is the available remedy; the court therefore construed the submission accordingly.
Whether the refusal to register the applicant in the cantonal lawyer register should be overturned.
No grounds were shown to disturb the cantonal decision refusing the lawyer patent/register entry.
The applicant did not show that he possessed a lawyer's patent, and his remaining arguments were merely inadmissible criticism of federal law, which is binding on the court.
Whether the applicant was entitled to free legal aid.
Free legal aid was denied because the appeal was hopeless.
The claims had no prospects of success, so the request for unentgeltliche Rechtspflege could not be granted.
Whether the applicant had to advance procedural costs.
The request to be exempted from the advance payment became moot because the decision was rendered without requiring an advance.
Since no cost advance was collected in these proceedings, the exemption request had no remaining purpose.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.