Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the public-law appeal against the cantonal refusal of recusal was admissible
Extrahierter Entscheid
The appeal was inadmissible because the appellants acted in a procedurally abusive manner and failed to meaningfully challenge the cantonal court's reasoning.
Extrahierte Begründung
The appellants merely repeated inconsistent criticism of the proceedings and did not refute the detailed reasons given by the cantonal court; this amounted to abusive litigation under Art. 36a(2) OJ.