Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the federal criminal appeal was sufficiently reasoned under Art. 42(2) BGG
Extrahierter Entscheid
The appeal did not engage with the cantonal reasoning and did not show any constitutional violation; the court therefore could not review it.
Extrahierte Begründung
For decisions based on cantonal law, only constitutional grievances are reviewable; such grievances must be specifically and clearly argued. The appellant failed to address the appellate court's reasons, so the mandatory substantiation requirement was not met.