Content of objection under Art. 74(2) SchKGKI-generiert

Daulte sought continuation of debt enforcement after the debtor filed an objection stating that he opposed part of the amount and demanded a more exact accounting. The cantonal supervisory authority considered the objection valid, and the creditor appealed. The Federal Court held that the declaration had to be interpreted as a whole and, in context, meant a denial of the claim's liquidity and enforceability until proper clarification. Because Art. 74(2) SchKG applies only where the debtor clearly admits part of the claim as liquid and enforceable, the objection was valid and the appeal was dismissed.